(this), range, vtkDataArrayPrivate::AllValues{}, Supported{});
| ^ ~~~~~~~~
```
Fedora Rawhide x86\_64
gcc 10.2.1
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Richard
---
### Author:  [@ben.boeckel](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/ben.boeckel)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2020, 12:21am UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/2 "2020-11-17T00:21:32Z")
It looks like there’s a `#define AllValues ???` somewhere around. Does the preprocessed source look odd for the lines reported on here? (Add `-E` and change the output to be `-o preproc.txt` instead on the command line for the TU.)
Other than that, maybe @RobertMaynard has a better idea? @AllisonVacanti might have time to answer as well with luck.
---
### Author:  [@RobertMaynard](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/RobertMaynard)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2020, 12:26am UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/3 "2020-11-17T00:26:07Z")
Looks to be an issue where Xutil defines an `AllValues` macro.
[https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/-/issues/18048](https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/-/issues/18048)
---
### Author:  [@wulicheng](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/wulicheng)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2020, 12:53am UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/4 "2020-11-17T00:53:44Z")
[https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/-/issues/18048](https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/-/issues/18048)
---
### Author:  [@Richard\_Shaw](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/Richard_Shaw)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2020, 12:35pm UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/5 "2020-11-17T12:35:40Z")
Thanks for the link. Any idea on what the solution will be?
Thanks,
Richard
---
### Author:  [@ben.boeckel](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/ben.boeckel)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2020, 1:09pm UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/6 "2020-11-17T13:09:26Z")
> [@Richard\_Shaw](#):
>
> Any idea on what the solution will be?
VTK will need to rename that structure.
---
### Author:  [@Richard\_Shaw](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/Richard_Shaw)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2020, 1:15pm UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/7 "2020-11-17T13:15:30Z")
Is it safe to use the workaround posted in the issue or should I wait? We’re currently trying to upgrade the whole stack and dependencies in Fedora (OCC, vtk).
---
### Author:  [@ben.boeckel](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/ben.boeckel)
#### Post date: [November 17, 2020, 1:49pm UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/8 "2020-11-17T13:49:10Z")
Feel free to use `vtkAllValues` for now. I don’t imagine it is used very much outside of VTK right now.
---
### Author:  [@Richard\_Shaw](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/Richard_Shaw)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2020, 1:33am UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/9 "2020-11-18T01:33:54Z")
Ok, not sure if it has to do with me renaming AllValues but after about 2.5 hours I ran into this:
```
/builddir/build/BUILD/VTK-9.0.1/Rendering/FreeType/vtkFreeTypeTools.cxx:382:1: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before 'vtkFreeTypeToolsFaceRequester'
382 | vtkFreeTypeToolsFaceRequester(
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/VTK-9.0.1/Rendering/FreeType/vtkFreeTypeTools.cxx: In member function 'virtual FT_Error vtkFreeTypeTools::CreateFTCManager()':
/builddir/build/BUILD/VTK-9.0.1/Rendering/FreeType/vtkFreeTypeTools.cxx:1154:61: error: 'vtkFreeTypeToolsFaceRequester' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'vtkFreeTypeToolsCleanupCounter'?
1154 | this->MaximumNumberOfSizes, this->MaximumNumberOfBytes, vtkFreeTypeToolsFaceRequester,
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| vtkFreeTypeToolsCleanupCounter
```
---
### Author:  [@ben.boeckel](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/ben.boeckel)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2020, 1:42am UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/10 "2020-11-18T01:42:24Z")
Hmm. Not sure exactly, but it looks like `FT_CALLBACK_DEF(FT_Error)` is expanding improperly. What version of FreeType is being used? It’s working here with `freetype-devel-2.10.4-1.fc33.x86_64`.
---
### Author:  [@Richard\_Shaw](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/Richard_Shaw)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2020, 3:07am UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/11 "2020-11-18T03:07:47Z")
Same version, just the Rawhide f34 package…
---
### Author:  [@Richard\_Shaw](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/Richard_Shaw)
#### Post date: [November 18, 2020, 3:08am UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/12 "2020-11-18T03:08:41Z")
Full log:
[https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/orion/vtk9.0/fedora-rawhide-x86\_64/01772259-vtk/builder-live.log.gz](https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/orion/vtk9.0/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01772259-vtk/builder-live.log.gz)
---
### Author:  [@ben.boeckel](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/ben.boeckel)
#### Post date: [November 21, 2020, 6:21pm UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/13 "2020-11-21T18:21:14Z")
And just reproduced the problem here: [https://open.cdash.org/viewBuildError.php?buildid=6890950](https://open.cdash.org/viewBuildError.php?buildid=6890950)
---
### Author:  [@ben.boeckel](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/ben.boeckel)
#### Post date: [November 21, 2020, 6:34pm UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/14 "2020-11-21T18:34:25Z")
Investigating, it appears as though `FT_CALLBACK_DEF` has always been meant to be internal. This is true as of 2.10.4. [https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/-/merge\_requests/7432](https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/-/merge_requests/7432)
---
### Author:  [@Richard\_Shaw](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/Richard_Shaw)
#### Post date: [November 22, 2020, 10:43pm UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/15 "2020-11-22T22:43:21Z")
I applied the commit as a patch and got this far:
```
/builddir/build/BUILD/VTK-9.0.1/Rendering/FreeType/vtkFreeTypeTools.cxx
/builddir/build/BUILD/VTK-9.0.1/Rendering/FreeType/vtkFreeTypeTools.cxx:382:1: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before 'vtkFreeTypeToolsFaceRequester'
382 | vtkFreeTypeToolsFaceRequester(
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/builddir/build/BUILD/VTK-9.0.1/Rendering/FreeType/vtkFreeTypeTools.cxx: In member function 'virtual FT_Error vtkFreeTypeTools::CreateFTCManager()':
/builddir/build/BUILD/VTK-9.0.1/Rendering/FreeType/vtkFreeTypeTools.cxx:1154:61: error: 'vtkFreeTypeToolsFaceRequester' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'vtkFreeTypeToolsCleanupCounter'?
1154 | this->MaximumNumberOfSizes, this->MaximumNumberOfBytes, vtkFreeTypeToolsFaceRequester,
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| vtkFreeTypeToolsCleanupCounter
```
---
### Author:  [@ben.boeckel](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/ben.boeckel)
#### Post date: [November 23, 2020, 1:01am UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/16 "2020-11-23T01:01:40Z")
Hmm. I suspect something else went wrong there (still seems like it is missing a return type). Here is Fedora’s fix: [https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vtk/c/00964b32afb5e933ba39b9cf81f72dbf998b1ca7?branch=master](https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vtk/c/00964b32afb5e933ba39b9cf81f72dbf998b1ca7?branch=master)
Seems freetype reverted the removal based on comments there. The change I made makes it not care anymore.
---
### Author:  [@ben.boeckel](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/ben.boeckel)
#### Post date: [November 23, 2020, 1:02am UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/17 "2020-11-23T01:02:47Z")
Oh 🤦♂️ , there are 2 uses of the macro in VTK…the other needs fixed too.
Fix for the other one is here: [https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/-/merge\_requests/7434](https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/-/merge_requests/7434)
---
### Author:  [@Richard\_Shaw](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/Richard_Shaw)
#### Post date: [November 23, 2020, 3:30pm UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/18 "2020-11-23T15:30:40Z")
So I should use your fix, correct? It looks like Sandro worked around it but Orion and I are working on the whole vtk/opencascade stack separately in a COPR:
> **[orion/vtk9.0
Copr](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/orion/vtk9.0/)**
I have a side tag I’m doing all the official builds in and once complete it will be merged back into the Rawhide repository.
---
### Author:  [@ben.boeckel](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/ben.boeckel)
#### Post date: [November 23, 2020, 5:57pm UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/19 "2020-11-23T17:57:32Z")
I think the fixes I did is more useful long-term. Feel free to merge the two diffs into one patchfile though. Both MRs are on top of 9.0.0, so they should apply cleanly.
---
### Author:  [@Richard\_Shaw](https://discourse.vtk.org/u/Richard_Shaw)
#### Post date: [November 24, 2020, 1:13pm UTC](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673/20 "2020-11-24T13:13:44Z")
All seems good now… Only problem is how long it takes to build 🙂
The build was automatically killed after 5 hours in the COPR. Took almost 2 1/2 hours on my workstation.
Thanks,
Richard
[Next page](https://discourse.vtk.org/t/building-opencascade-7-5-0-with-vtk-9-0-1/4673.md?page=2)